Prioress

The Unholy stick superior Canterbury Tales, by Geoffrey Chaucer, is a accruement of tales that atomic number 18 told by a convention of people who ar on a religious pilgr get up to the Canterbury Cathedral. Among the characters included in the front oecumenic Prologue is a Nun, or a Prioress. Also cognize as Madame Eglantine, the Prioress is the mother superior at her nun buoy buoynery (p.181, pedestrian 7). Portrayed as a delicate and well-mannered woman, she speaks French and has another nun and three priests traveling with her. Chaucer also notes that the Prioress has a precious coral trinket on her breakgrowth, and a opulent brooch on her rosary, embossed with the Latin motto: Amor vincit omnia (line 162). In the General Prologue, Chaucer gives passably straightforward descriptions of the character of the Prioress. His presentation of Madame Eglantines image is almost deceivingly flawless, yet it is not genuine. Like most of the other pilgrims on this jo urney, the Prioress is vulnerable to subtle criticisms. Although he praises her appearance and her prominence as a nun, Chaucer deliberately leaves a possible nurture that would reveal her hypocrisy. From lines 127 to 141, Chaucer hints that the Prioress is a puritan and that her impeccable adroitness and her overwhelming effort for refinement are merely sciolistic and unnecessary. She exposes too much emphasis on her figure and too little on her religious dedications. contempt being a superior at her nunnery, the Prioress conducts herself in the fashion that exemplifies to a greater extent of a lady from a loaded family than of an ascetic nun. With the lines [o]f smale houndes hadde she that she fedde [w]ith rosted flesh, or milk and wastelbreed, and [o]f sm all(prenominal) coral aboute hir arm she bar [a] paire of bedes, gauded all with greene, [a]nd theron heeng a brooch of gold ful sheene, Chaucer implies that the nun is living a wealthy life full of valuable mat erial goods, indicating her daftness in wor! ldly pleasures (lines 146-147, 158-160).

Even the prints on her brooch that rake Love conquers all is unclear whether that endure to godly adore or secular love (p.182, footnote 1). Chaucer then mocks her bigness by sarcastically stating that [s]he was so openhearted and so pitous [that] she wolde weepe if that she axiom a mous [c]aught in a trappe, if it were execution or bledde, which seems more(prenominal) like a gross overreaction (lines 144-155). Also, Chaucer points out that the Prioress French was conditioned at the scole of Stratford at the Bowe, and that the more de luxe Frenssh of Paris was to require unknowe (lines 125, 126). That Madame Eglantine is not as pharisaical and genuine as she appears to be clearly suggests a foreshorten of hypocrisy and immorality. Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Canterbury Tales: The General Prologue. The Norton Anthology of English Literature: The Major Authors, seventh Ed. Abrahms, M.H., Ed. New York: W.W.Norton, 2001 If you requirement to get a full essay, couch it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay