Explanations for the Rise of Fascism and National Socialism

Explanations of Fascism and issue Socialism I.         Russian Marxists--1920s A.         They used Fascism generically to outline Germany as well B.         Their explanation was that Fascism was a bourgeoisie camarilla to stop a Socialist revolution in Europe, in which Italian leading collaborated with German attracters to stop Socialism (of telephone line this fascist movement was therefore economically motivated as it was a bourgeoisie conspiracy) C.         The big problem with this explanation was that it was a deal movement, and mass movements are generally not anti-Socialist conspiracies organised by a few people in dark, smoke-filled rooms II.          westbound Marxists--Pre-WWII A.         Formulated an economic reason for twain movements success B.         They discovered that the middle- mark ( minor shop owners, artisans, etc.) were disproportionately attracted to Fasci sm, and contumacious that this was because they were the ones most hurt by hyperinflation (their savings were wiped out, but the peasants and workers didnt dumbfound anything in the first place) and industrialism (goods immediately mass produced) C.         Therefore Hitlers call off to close down the section stores, therefore putting small shop owners back into the competition, and the fascistic Corporate State, although I dont rejoin why, appealed to the lower middle class; thats the reason for the branchies successes in that ambit III.         Western Historians--Post WWII A.         Gave a reason for field Socialisms success B.         Its part of Germanys culture: Germany has always had militaristic, conservative, and nationalistic tendencies C.         This, of course, doesnt explain Fascism IV.

         system situated out in Hannah Arendts Origins of totalisticism A.         Defined Totalitarianism and Authoritarianism, placing issue Socialist Germany and the Soviet Union under the Totalitarian crowd together and Fascist Italy under the Authoritarian category B.         A Totalitarian governance had to have: 1.         A very strong, singularly tendinous leader who usually has a special title; Hitler (de Fuhrer) and Stalin (Comrade, although that wasnt... I LOVE THESE NOTES, THEY rightfully ARE HELPING ME ON MY demonstrate TOMORROW. THE ONLY paradox IS THE ALT%^ STUFF BUT I DOUBT THATS THE AUTHORS MISTAKE. grand WORK If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay