The Hobby Lobby Lawsuit

watchfulness and privacy, discrimination, internet privacy, racial profiling, secrecy, prison conditions, consumer privacy, immigration detention, nascency control, and target in immigration laws atomic number 18 the closely prominent concerns in forthwiths society. These issues have many sides and origins debating each side. Right in a flash birth control is iodine of the top issues in the media.\nThe challenge on whether to supply employees the expediency of contraceptives is a highly debated topic. umteen traditional debaters are against the thought process because of sacred views. They believe that knowledgeable intercourse should be protected for marriage and that there should be no need for birth control if these views are put into practice. The opposing side of the argu handst is the people who believe that if men are given condoms, women should be given birth control. This topic is important because it pertains directly to womens rights given to them by the constitution. In many situations, men are given more freedoms wherefore women.\nOne example of this on doing, Is the avocation residence lawsuit. On March 25, 2014 Hobby Lobby went up against the Government in a Supreme motor inn Lawsuit against the Affordable tutelage Act. They stated that the Act was criminal due to religion and traditions. Hobby Lobby agreed to honorarium for another(prenominal) forms of contraceptives such as Plan B or Ella, but would not pass for forms of birth control pills and devices that subvert human life. The Washington blot writes, The question these cases are pursuance to solve is whether for-profit companies have a right to exercise religious freedom under the ghostly Freedom Restoration Act, a federal law passed in 1993 that states the Government shall not considerably burden a mortals exercise of religion even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability. CNN famous that, Three federal appeals courts just about the coun try have stricken down the contraception coverage rule, while two other appeals courts have upheld it...