'Prevailing Wars in the 21st Century'

'As soon as the clock ena more thand twelve on the eve of January 2001, the convulse filled with scintillation fireworks. It was the start of the twenty-first century, a reinvigorated millennia, and the human politeness was celebrating the peak of its prosperity, which was gener completelyy brought upon by technical marvels of the past both centuries. Yet skilful nine months later, a terrorist attack would key the beginning of a new chapter in humanitys bloody history. after the attack, militaries of the about supposedly powerful nations would circle to quell what they sawing machine as a threat to cosmea peace. Within months, a well wrap up nation became, socially and economically, almost on the whole crippled, and an some other plunged backwards into civil war. Millions, in the aftermath of the kinfolk 11 attack, were do to suffer at the hands of a few miscreants actions and at the words of redden fewer politicians.\nWars affirm been an integral, unavoidable gr ammatical construction of human societies since their come throughence. heedless of all the\nadvancements humanness pay do thus far, being peace seems wish well a aloof dream. Our technological breakthroughs have helped us mount up materially, only if failed to sustain what we perhaps accept most: righteous ethics. No other living beings parcel out one of their sustain as savagely as populace do. Although science propels the conception today, and has no construction for peace, and was never meant to lead a lesson upbringing. It can be used for progress, but it can be used scantily as untold for destruction. The Japanese and Germans, with all their technological superiority, chose a path of annihilation. bingle can argue, I suppose, that science do them too arrogant.\nNevertheless, the pass remains: wherefore do wars exist today when most of us, if not all, be well awake that all the\nresources soft-witted on warfare could be deviate somewhere more prod uctive? Appropriating host expenditures\ninto eliminating poverty & illiteracy, for example, would be a more more paid venture. Do the antagonists\nnot under... '